postwatcher04 - at - hotmail.com

About PostWatch
 
..::Archives::..


 
..::Links::..
The Nation

Winds of Change

Memri

Virginia Gun Rights

= WatchBlogs =
Timeswatch

Alphecca

Biased BBC

ChronWatch (SF Chronicle)

Croooow Blog

OmbudsGod

Regnum Crucis

Rhetorica









  ..::Other Links::..
Debka.com

Independent Women's Forum

Inkwell

MRC

Romanesko

CampusWatch.org

Amy Wellborn

Mark Shea

Kesher Talk

Right Wing News

Eleven Day Empire

Discriminations

Where is Raed?

Healing Iraq

The Command Post

Powerline







 
PostWatch: An irregular correction to the Washington Post


Brought to you by Christopher Rake
















PostWatch
 

Wednesday, February 12, 2003
 
5:26 PM

The Post and Slate.com are hyping up parallels between John Lott's embarrassing disclosure about posting under a pseudonym to defend his research and losing data on the effects of concealed-carry. I don't have time to do all the links at the moment, but this comparison, in the Post referncing Slate's Timothy Noah, is ridiculous:
Lott vehemently denies faking the study but does acknowledge that he created Mary -- an admission that has his critics suspecting the worst. "We know Lott invented an online persona. Did he invent the 98 percent figure? Did he invent the survey it purportedly came from? We don't know," Noah wrote last week.

Does all this sound familiar? Last year, Emory University historian Michael Bellesiles was unable to produce the data on which his prizewinning book "Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture" were based. The study suggested that few people in frontier America had guns, a finding that displeased gun lovers. Bellesiles said his records were lost in a flood. A university investigation raised doubts, and he resigned. No comment, say AEI administrators.

Lott is embarking upon new research to bolster his earlier claim that brandishing a gun deterred a crime 98% of the time. This is something Michael Bellesiles could not do, since his research (claiming low early American gun-ownership rates) was based either on error or deliberate falsification. And this account in the Post masks the magnitude of L'affaire Bellesiles, whose findings did not merely "displease gun lovers" or "raise doubts" in a university investigation. It did rather more than that. It led to an almost universal debunking of his book's thesis, a forced resignation from Emory after a damning university investigation, the withdrawal of an NEH grant, the termination of his publishing contract, and revocation of the immensely prestigious Bancroft award.

Other than that, the two cases are exactly the same.

UPDATE: Here is an exhaustive blogging of L'Affaire Lott. My quick reading of it is that it's anti-Lott, but it includes some pro-Lott links as well as responses from...Mrs. Lott!



Comments: Post a Comment
 
Powered by Blogger Pro™


Google
Search WWW Search postwatch.blogspot.com