postwatcher04 - at - hotmail.com

About PostWatch
 
..::Archives::..


 
..::Links::..
The Nation

Winds of Change

Memri

Virginia Gun Rights

= WatchBlogs =
Timeswatch

Alphecca

Biased BBC

ChronWatch (SF Chronicle)

Croooow Blog

OmbudsGod

Regnum Crucis

Rhetorica









  ..::Other Links::..
Debka.com

Independent Women's Forum

Inkwell

MRC

Romanesko

CampusWatch.org

Amy Wellborn

Mark Shea

Kesher Talk

Right Wing News

Eleven Day Empire

Discriminations

Where is Raed?

Healing Iraq

The Command Post

Powerline







 
PostWatch: An irregular correction to the Washington Post


Brought to you by Christopher Rake
















PostWatch
 

Sunday, January 12, 2003
 
10:13 PM

PostWatch reader Fred Ray writes with two interesting items.

First, he says that contrary to my joust below, Al Sharpton owes Steven Pagones $65,000. "He
hasn't paid a cent and probably never will, since he now has no assets of his own," Fred writes. I don't exactly know how that would be the case--Sharpton wears some pretty nice suits these days, even if they don't cost $65,000--but I do vaguely recall that soon after the judgment was announced, there was a lot of trouble collecting the funds. I assumed it had finally been paid because during the exchange on Meet the Press, Tim Russert said "you paid $65,000" for the defamation suit. Either Russert misspoke or he had bad information. If that's wrong, sorry for passing it on.

Second, Fred notes another "Augusta Remains Silent" story--that is, a paper that creates a story by noting someone hasn't said something the editors, in their wisdom, think he should. This week's version: Bush Plans No Apology Over Lott Remarks:

The White House and the Republican Party have decided against taking overt steps to make amends for racially charged remarks by Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) because President Bush's aides said he has nothing to apologize for and should not pander, officials said.

There is some interesting information in the story, however:

Most significantly, Bush officials said he may go with his initial instinct and register his objections to race-based preferences in the University of Michigan's admissions, which are being reviewed by the Supreme Court in the biggest affirmative action case in a generation.

I certainly hope so. The Washington Times was writing last week that the Administration was leaning toward the duck-and-cover approach.




Comments: Post a Comment
 
Powered by Blogger Pro™


Google
Search WWW Search postwatch.blogspot.com