postwatcher04 - at - hotmail.com

About PostWatch
 
..::Archives::..


 
..::Links::..
The Nation

Winds of Change

Memri

Virginia Gun Rights

= WatchBlogs =
Timeswatch

Alphecca

Biased BBC

ChronWatch (SF Chronicle)

Croooow Blog

OmbudsGod

Regnum Crucis

Rhetorica









  ..::Other Links::..
Debka.com

Independent Women's Forum

Inkwell

MRC

Romanesko

CampusWatch.org

Amy Wellborn

Mark Shea

Kesher Talk

Right Wing News

Eleven Day Empire

Discriminations

Where is Raed?

Healing Iraq

The Command Post

Powerline







 
PostWatch: An irregular correction to the Washington Post


Brought to you by Christopher Rake
















PostWatch
 

Monday, November 11, 2002
 
10:57 PM

Speech codes are the topic of a brief column in the Sunday magazine by Jay Mathews. It's generally pleasing, because he objects to the codes and highlights an "upstart" organization, FIRE, which actually has been around for awhile now but has been discovered by Mathews.

The FIRE staffers are of both the left and the right. They campaign against speech codes and harassment rules that seem ready to stomp into the carpet any pimply freshman who causes distress by quoting Ayn Rand or Mao Zedong or Henry Miller or the Playboy philosophy.

What Mathews doesn't quite spell out is that the vast majority of speech codes bar conservatives and religious Christians from speaking their mind without being intimidated. Most students at most schools can pitch Mao all they want; it's Bush or the American flag that gets you into trouble.

FIRE criticized Central Michigan University dormitory supervisors for telling student Don Pasco to remove what they said were offensive decorations after the September 11 attacks. Pasco was, naturally, a freshman who had not spent enough time on campus to realize that the flag, the eagle and the Miami Herald editorial on his door might be considered too political and controversial for public display.

FIRE, according to InstaMan, has taken on early efforts to adopt a supposedly anti-racist speech code at the University of Tennessee, some whose students are examining ways to bar speech that is "technically' in violation of First Amendment guarantees.

My short list of the useless qualifier "technical":

Technically barring free speech
Technically being pregnant
Being, you know, dead, technically




Comments: Post a Comment
 
Powered by Blogger Pro™


Google
Search WWW Search postwatch.blogspot.com