postwatcher04 - at - hotmail.com

About PostWatch
 
..::Archives::..


 
..::Links::..
The Nation

Winds of Change

Memri

Virginia Gun Rights

= WatchBlogs =
Timeswatch

Alphecca

Biased BBC

ChronWatch (SF Chronicle)

Croooow Blog

OmbudsGod

Regnum Crucis

Rhetorica









  ..::Other Links::..
Debka.com

Independent Women's Forum

Inkwell

MRC

Romanesko

CampusWatch.org

Amy Wellborn

Mark Shea

Kesher Talk

Right Wing News

Eleven Day Empire

Discriminations

Where is Raed?

Healing Iraq

The Command Post

Powerline







 
PostWatch: An irregular correction to the Washington Post


Brought to you by Christopher Rake
















PostWatch
 

Friday, October 18, 2002
 
8:10 AM

Post reader Richard Bishop of Asheville,N.C., gets his letter to the editor printed on Richard Cohen's unbelievable column on the glories of ballistic fingerprinting. I was hoping for a Saturday Free for All barrage, but you don't always get what you want in life.

Richard Cohen makes some common mistakes in "A Few Good Fingerprints" [op-ed, Oct. 17].

It is a waste of time and money to try to "fingerprint" guns and ammunition. The only results would be higher costs and the unfair targeting of innocent people, such as sport shooters and hunters. A bullet or casing fingerprint can be altered easily with a few quick scratches from a file or through any number of common gunsmithing procedures, some of which are necessary for safety, repair or improved accuracy.

In addition, the .223 bullet is not significantly different from other ammunition. Bullets are designed to spread; that makes hunting more humane and the legitimate use of deadly force effective. Mr. Cohen might as well complain that knives are sharp.

The sniper could use any hunting rifle or one of many target rifles. What difference does it make?



Comments: Post a Comment
 
Powered by Blogger Pro™


Google
Search WWW Search postwatch.blogspot.com